POLICY AND DIGITAL HANDBOOK

Philippine Law Institute of Asia -Professionals and Continuing Studies
MEMORANDUM

To: All Students, Faculty, and Staff
From: Office of the President
School Year: 2026-2027
Subject: Mandatory Compliance with the Institute Code of Conduct

Dear Members of the Institute,

This memorandum serves as formal notice that adherence to the Philippine Law Institute of Asia Code of Conduct is mandatory and non-negotiable for all students, faculty, and staff, across online, face-to-face, and on-campus learning environments. The Code sets forth the standards of integrity, professionalism, accountability, and ethical conduct that underpin the Institute’s global reputation and legal standing.

Any deviation, misconduct, or breach of these standards will be addressed through rigorous, transparent, and enforceable procedures, in accordance with the Institute’s Student Complaints & Appeals Policy and Maladministration Policy. Compliance is not merely expected—it is a formal obligation of every member of this academic and professional community.

By remaining part of Einstein Oxfordshire, you are legally and ethically bound to uphold these principles, ensuring the protection, integrity, and prestige of the Institute, and safeguarding the value of its internationally recognised programmes.

Failure to comply will be met with appropriate disciplinary action, which may include suspension or termination of enrolment or employment.

Sincerely,
D.V.,PhD,MBA,ME.ED
Lord Chancellor of Global Education and Deputy
Philippine Law Institute of Asia 

1. Health, Safety & Wellbeing Policy

At Philippine Law Institute of Asia ( PLIA) - Professionals and Continuing Studies, the health, safety, and wellbeing of students, faculty, and staff is our foremost priority. This policy establishes a comprehensive framework to ensure a secure, supportive, and inclusive learning environment across all programmes and campuses. It covers physical safety measures, mental health support, accessibility accommodations, and emergency preparedness, ensuring that all members can pursue their academic and professional goals with confidence. Responsibilities are clearly outlined for management, staff, and students to promote proactive engagement in safety and wellness initiatives. Training, monitoring, and regular review mechanisms ensure continuous improvement. By fostering a holistic approach to wellbeing, the Institute demonstrates its commitment to cultivating a thriving, resilient, and productive community, supporting both personal and professional development while maintaining international standards of care and operational excellence.

2. Academic Integrity & Malpractice Policy

PLIA upholds the highest standards of academic integrity and professional ethics. This policy clearly defines expectations regarding honesty, originality, and responsible scholarship for students, faculty, and staff. Academic malpractice, including plagiarism, cheating, falsification, and misrepresentation, is strictly prohibited, and transparent procedures are established for investigation and resolution of breaches. The policy fosters a culture of integrity by promoting critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and originality in academic work. Staff are trained to identify, prevent, and address misconduct, while learners receive guidance on best practices. Reporting mechanisms and disciplinary procedures ensure fair, consistent, and timely handling of issues, protecting the credibility of the Institute’s programs. By enforcing this policy, the Institute ensures that its qualifications meet international recognition standards, maintain rigor, and uphold the professional reputation of graduates worldwide.

3. Maladministration Policy

The Maladministration Policy ensures that all administrative processes at PLIA are fair, accurate, and reliable. It covers course management, assessment administration, certification, and operational procedures to prevent errors, mismanagement, or irregularities. Staff responsibilities are clearly defined to promote accountability and uphold institutional integrity. Reporting, investigation, and corrective procedures provide transparent mechanisms for addressing any administrative issues, protecting students’ rights and maintaining trust in the Institute’s operations. Regular monitoring, internal audits, and quality assurance measures reinforce compliance with established standards and continuous improvement. By implementing this policy rigorously, the Institute guarantees that its administrative systems uphold professional, ethical, and operational excellence, ensuring learners experience accurate, timely, and equitable academic support and services throughout their learning journey.

4. Conflict of Interest Policy

PLIA  is committed to transparency and impartiality in all academic, administrative, and governance activities. This policy requires staff, faculty, and leadership to declare any personal, financial, or professional interests that may influence decision-making or give rise to a perceived conflict. Procedures for identification, disclosure, and management of conflicts ensure that all actions are taken objectively and ethically. The policy applies to assessment, admissions, partnerships, procurement, and other professional interactions, safeguarding the Institute’s integrity. Compliance is monitored regularly, and guidance is provided to prevent breaches and maintain stakeholder confidence. By enforcing this policy, the Institute demonstrates its dedication to ethical standards, impartial governance, and accountability, reinforcing trust among students, staff, and international partners.

5. Data Protection & Privacy Policy

PLIA  values the protection of personal and academic data. This policy ensures compliance with global data protection standards, including GDPR principles, to safeguard the privacy of students, faculty, staff, and partners. It outlines secure procedures for the collection, processing, storage, and sharing of information, emphasizing confidentiality and ethical handling. Roles and responsibilities for data protection are clearly defined, with regular audits, monitoring, and staff training to ensure compliance. The policy also establishes procedures for responding to data breaches or unauthorized access promptly and effectively. By implementing this policy, the Institute reinforces its commitment to trust, transparency, and international best practices in information management, providing assurance to learners and stakeholders that personal and academic data are secure and responsibly managed.

6. Anti-Discrimination & Equality Policy

PLIA  promotes a culture of equality, diversity, and inclusion. This policy ensures that all students, staff, and stakeholders are treated with respect and fairness, regardless of race, gender, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic background. Procedures are in place to prevent discrimination, harassment, and bullying, and to address complaints promptly and effectively. The policy applies to all aspects of admissions, employment, teaching, assessment, and professional engagement. Training and awareness initiatives are conducted regularly to embed inclusive practices throughout the Institute. By fostering an equitable and supportive environment, the Institute enhances learning outcomes, professional development, and collaboration while maintaining compliance with international equality and human rights standards, reflecting a commitment to a globally respected educational institution.

7. Student Complaints & Appeals Policy

This policy provides a structured, fair, and transparent process for students to raise concerns or appeal academic or administrative decisions at PLIA. Students are encouraged to report issues promptly, with clearly defined steps for investigation, communication, and resolution. Confidentiality and impartiality are maintained throughout the process, ensuring equitable treatment for all parties. The policy covers complaints related to teaching, assessment, administrative support, and programme delivery, emphasizing timely and professional handling. Students have access to guidance and support during the process, ensuring their rights and interests are protected. By implementing this policy, the Institute reinforces its commitment to fairness, accountability, and high-quality education while fostering trust and confidence in its academic and professional standards.

8. Examination & Assessment Policy

PLIA is committed to conducting examinations and assessments with fairness, reliability, and transparency. This policy defines procedures for assessment design, moderation, grading, and feedback to ensure academic rigor and consistency. It establishes mechanisms for addressing academic disputes or appeals, providing students with a clear, professional process for evaluation concerns. Responsibilities are defined for faculty, assessors, and administrators to maintain impartiality and integrity in all assessments. The policy also includes provisions for reasonable accommodations and accessibility for learners with special needs. By enforcing this policy, the Institute guarantees that its assessment practices uphold international quality standards, reflect professional excellence, and provide credible evidence of learners’ knowledge and skills.

9. Whistleblowing Policy

PLIA provides secure and confidential channels for students, staff, and partners to report unethical, illegal, or unsafe practices. This policy protects whistleblowers from retaliation, ensuring they can raise concerns with confidence. Procedures define reporting methods, investigation steps, and follow-up actions while maintaining fairness and transparency. All members are encouraged to report instances of malpractice, misconduct, or violations of Institute policies. By fostering an open and accountable culture, the Institute reinforces ethical behavior, compliance, and organizational integrity. This policy demonstrates the Institute’s dedication to maintaining professional standards, protecting stakeholders, and promoting trust and confidence among students, staff, and external partners.

10. Professional Conduct & Ethics Policy

This policy defines expected standards of professional behavior at PLIA. Students, staff, and faculty are expected to uphold integrity, respect, accountability, and ethical decision-making in all academic, administrative, and professional interactions. The policy addresses behavior in teaching, assessment, research, communications, partnerships, and external engagements. It provides guidance on resolving ethical dilemmas, reporting breaches, and maintaining a culture of respect and professionalism. Compliance with this policy ensures the Institute maintains its international reputation for excellence, cultivates responsible leadership, and develops graduates with the highest standards of professional conduct and ethical awareness.

11. Environmental & Sustainability Policy

PLIA is committed to sustainable operations and environmental stewardship. This policy promotes responsible use of resources, waste reduction, energy efficiency, and sustainable practices across all academic and administrative activities. Students and staff are encouraged to participate in initiatives supporting environmental awareness and sustainability in learning, research, and professional projects. The policy also guides curriculum integration, campus management, and partnerships, ensuring that environmental considerations inform decision-making and operations. By implementing this policy, the Institute demonstrates global responsibility, prepares learners to operate in a sustainable world, and reinforces its reputation as a forward-thinking, socially responsible, and internationally respected institution.

12. Research & Intellectual Property Policy

PLIA values innovation, creativity, and the ethical use of research and intellectual property. This policy ensures that all research, publications, course materials, and creative outputs are properly attributed, protected, and ethically managed. It covers ownership, collaboration agreements, licensing, and the responsible use of third-party materials. Procedures are established to safeguard both the Institute and the contributors while promoting innovation and academic excellence. Staff and students are trained on compliance, ethical research practices, and intellectual property management. By upholding this policy, the Institute ensures that its research and educational materials meet international standards, supporting global recognition, credibility, and the professional advancement of its learners and faculty.

Code of Conduct – Students & Staff

Philippine Law Institute of Asia

Purpose and Scope

This Code of Conduct sets the professional, ethical, and behavioural standards expected of all students, faculty, and staff. It applies across all programmes, delivery methods, and learning environments, including online classes, face-to-face sessions, and on-campus activities. The Code ensures a safe, respectful, and inclusive environment that supports learning, personal development, and professional growth while maintaining the Institute’s global reputation for excellence.

Key Rules and Expectations

1. Integrity & Honesty: All members must act honestly in all academic, administrative, and professional activities. Academic malpractice, cheating, or falsification of records is strictly prohibited.
   
   

2. Respect & Inclusion: Treat all individuals with dignity. Discrimination, harassment, or bullying of any kind in physical or virtual spaces is unacceptable.
   
   

3. Professionalism: Maintain appropriate conduct, communication, and appearance in classrooms, online platforms, and campus facilities.
   
   

4. Responsibility & Accountability: Attend classes, submit assignments on time, meet professional obligations, and comply with Institute policies.
   
   

5. Confidentiality & Privacy: Protect personal, academic, and professional data, including online communications and institutional documents.
   
   

6. Health, Safety & Wellbeing: Follow safety guidelines, participate in wellness programs, and report hazards or unsafe behaviour.
   
   

7. Ethical Engagement: Avoid conflicts of interest, act in the best interest of the Institute, and uphold ethical standards in all interactions.
   
   

Compliance and Enforcement

Violations may result in disciplinary action, including warnings, suspension, or termination of enrolment or employment. Procedures are fair, transparent, and include the right to appeal in line with the Institute’s Student Complaints & Appeals and Maladministration Policies.

Commitment

By enrolling or joining the Institute, all members commit to uphold this Code, fostering a safe, ethical, and globally respected learning environment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Philippine Law Institute of Asia

1. What is Philippine Law Institute of Asia?

PLIA is a global professional education provider offering executive and career‑focused programs, including Executive Skills Certificates, Professional Diplomas, Global Professional Diplomas, Advanced Executive Diplomas, and International Diplomas. We equip learners with practical skills, leadership expertise, and strategic understanding to excel in today’s competitive global marketplace.

2. Are your programs degree courses?

No. Our programs are professional and continuing education credentials, not academic degrees. They are designed to support career advancement, executive leadership development, and professional specialization without the academic requirements of traditional degrees. All programs are structured to align with industry needs and global best practices and is fully licensed by Security and Exchange Commission and accredited by Einstein Oxfordshire Accreditations.

3. What types of courses do you offer?

We offer a broad range of programs across multiple fields:

• Leadership & Management
  
  

• Finance, Accounting & Governance
  
  

• Supply Chain & Operations
  
  

• Digital Transformation & AI
  
  

• Media, Publishing & Communication
  
  

• Fashion, Arts & Creative Business
  
  

• Hospitality, Travel & Aviation
  
  

• Law, Paralegal & Governance
  
  

• Health Administration & Pharmacy
  
  

• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
  
  

Programs include short Executive Skills Certificates (5 weeks), Professional Diplomas (2 months), Global Professional Diplomas (3 months), Advanced Executive Diplomas (6 months), and International Diplomas (7 months).

4. Who can apply for your programs?

Our programs are designed for:

• Early, mid‑level, and senior professionals
  
  

• Managers and executives
  
  

• Entrepreneurs and business owners
  
  

• Specialists and industry practitioners
  
  

• Individuals seeking specialized professional upskilling
  
  

Each program has recommended background and professional relevance, but most do not require formal degrees — only the appropriate experience or interest level for meaningful engagement.

5. How are the programs delivered?

We offer flexible delivery models to fit professionals’ schedules:

• Online – fully virtual learning
  
  

• Blended – a mix of online and face‑to‑face sessions
  
  

• On‑Campus Workshops – for select programs and elective modules
  
  

All formats include interactive learning, case studies, simulations, and practical assignments.

6. Will I receive a certification upon completion?

Yes. Successful learners receive a credential from Philippine Law Institute of Asia , such as:

• Executive Skills Certificate
  
  

• Professional Diploma
  
  

• Global Professional Diploma
  
  

• Advanced Executive Diploma
  
  

• International Diploma
  
  

These credentials reflect your professional achievement and mastery in the subject area.

7. Are your programs internationally recognized?

Yes. Our programs are designed with international standards and are recognized by professional communities globally. While they are not academic degrees, they demonstrate professional competence and career readiness for roles across industries and regions.

8. Can your programs lead to university progression?

Many of our credentials — especially Global Professional Diplomas, Advanced Executive Diplomas, and International Diplomas — are structured to allow progression pathways with partner universities. However:
🔹 Progression depends on the receiving institution’s admission policies
🔹 Philippine Law Institute of Asia does not guarantee university placement or admissions

We work with academic partners to facilitate credible pathways where applicable.

9. Are there entry requirements?

Entry requirements vary by program level, but generally:

• Executive Skills Certificates: Open to professionals with basic qualifications or relevant interest
  
  

• Professional Diploma & Above: May require relevant work experience, professional background, or prior certifications
  
  

Specific requirements are listed on each program page.

10. How much do programs cost?

Program fees vary by credential type and delivery mode.

• Executive Skills Certificates (5 Weeks): Entry‑level pricing
  
  

• Professional & Global Diplomas: Mid‑range
  
  

• Advanced & International Diplomas: Premium investment, reflecting extended scope and professional depth
  
  

For precise fees, payment plans, and scholarships/grants:
📩 Contact admissions at einsteinschoolorg@gmail.com or check the Program Fee Chart on our website.

11. Do you offer payment plans or financial assistance?

Yes. We offer flexible payment options, installment plans, and, where applicable, scholarship support to qualified applicants. Contact our admissions team for personalized assistance.

12. How long does each program take?

Credential

Duration

Executive Skills Certificate (ESC)

5 Weeks

Professional Diploma (PD)

10–12 Weeks

Global Professional Diploma (GPD)

3 Months

Advanced Executive Diploma (AED)

6 Months

International Diploma (ID)

7 Months

13. How do I apply?

1. Visit our Admissions Portal
   
   

2. Choose your program
   
   

3. Complete the Online Application Form
   
   

4. Submit required documents & professional profile
   
   

5. Await confirmation and onboarding instructions
   
   

For assistance, our admissions team is available via email or live chat.

14. Are there assessments and exams?

Yes. Our programs include assessments aligned with learning outcomes, such as:

• Practical projects
  
  

• Case analyses
  
  

• Presentations
  
  

• Portfolio submissions
  
  

Assessment types vary by program level and disciplinary focus.

15. Can I study while working full‑time?

Absolutely. Our programs are structured for working professionals, with flexible scheduling and weekend or evening options for blended and on‑campus modules.

16. Do you issue transcripts and certificates?

Yes. Graduates receive:

• An Official Certificate of Completion and  optional transcript of records for an etra fee of  $50 USD
  
  

• Academic Transcript reflecting modules and assessments
  These credentials can be shared with employers, professional networks, and partners.
  
  

17. What support services are available?

We provide:

• Academic advising
  
  

• Career support & professional coaching
  
  

• Online learner resources and libraries
  
  

• Networking events and alumni community
  
  

18. How can I stay updated on programs and launches?

Follow us on:
📌 LinkedIn
📌 Facebook
📌 Instagram
📌 YouTube
Or subscribe to our monthly newsletter via our website homepage.

# ACCREDITATION, IMPARTIALITY & CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Philippine Law Institute of Asia (PLIA)

Einstein Oxfordshire Accreditations (EOA)

Effective Date: July 18,2026

Version:2.0  Circular THD

Policy Classification:Academic Quality Assurance / Institutional Governance

ARTICLE I — POLICY, PURPOSE AND GOVERNING PRINCIPLES

Section 1. Purpose

This Policy is hereby adopted to establish a clear, transparent, and accountable framework governing the accreditation, quality-assurance review, and programme assessment relationship between the Philippine Law Institute of Asia (PLIA) and Einstein Oxfordshire Accreditations (EOA).

The Policy is intended to safeguard academic integrity, impartiality, transparency, due process, consumer protection, institutional accountability, and the credibility of accreditation decisions, particularly in view of the fact that PLIA and EOA form part of the same wider organizational group.

Section 2. Governing Principles

All accreditation and quality-assurance activities shall be guided by the following principles:

1. Good Faith and Fair Dealing — The parties shall act honestly, fairly, and in good faith in the exercise of their respective rights and duties.

2. Impartiality— Accreditation decisions shall be based on established academic and quality-assurance criteria and shall not be predetermined by ownership, affiliation, commercial interest, or personal relationship.

3. Transparency— The organizational relationship between PLIA and EOA shall be disclosed accurately and shall not be represented as an unrelated third-party relationship.

4. Accountability — Accreditation decisions shall be supported by documented standards, assessment records, and identifiable decision-making procedures.

5. Non-Deception — No statement regarding accreditation, recognition, approval, qualification, or professional status shall be made in a manner that is false, misleading, or reasonably capable of creating a mistaken impression.

6. Protection of Learners — Students and prospective students shall receive material information concerning programme scope, fees, accreditation status, limitations, and applicable terms before enrollment.

ARTICLE II — PHILIPPINE LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Section 3. Civil Code of the Philippines

The parties recognize the general standards of conduct embodied in Articles 19, 20, and 21 of Republic Act No. 386, otherwise known as the Civil Code of the Philippines, including the duty to act with justice, give every person his due, and observe honesty and good faith in the exercise of rights and performance of duties.

Accordingly, accreditation and institutional representations shall be made in good faith and shall not be structured or communicated in a manner intended to mislead students, regulators, employers, partners, or the public.

Section 4. Consumer Protection and Fair Dealing

The parties shall observe applicable provisions of Republic Act No. 7394, otherwise known as the Consumer Act of the Philippines, particularly those concerning deceptive, unfair, or unconscionable sales acts or practices.

No advertisement, website statement, certificate description, enrollment material, or accreditation claim shall falsely represent that a programme or service possesses a sponsorship, approval, affiliation, standard, quality, or benefit that it does not in fact possess.

Section 5. Online Transactions

Where PLIA conducts enrollment, payment, advertising, student communication, or other educational transactions through electronic means, the parties shall observe applicable provisions of Republic Act No. 8792, otherwise known as the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000, together with other applicable laws and regulations governing electronic transactions and records.

Section 6. Data Privacy

Personal information obtained in connection with accreditation, enrollment, assessment, complaints, appeals, student records, or quality-assurance processes shall be handled in accordance with Republic Act No. 10173, otherwise known as the Data Privacy Act of 2012, and applicable rules and issuances of the National Privacy Commission.

Access to accreditation and student records shall be limited to authorized personnel with a legitimate institutional purpose.

Section 7. Legal Education Regulatory Framework

The parties acknowledge Republic Act No. 7662, otherwise known as the Legal Education Reform Act of 1993, which established the Legal Education Board and provides the statutory framework governing legal education and accreditation of law schools in the Philippines.

Nothing in this Policy shall be construed as representing that accreditation by Einstein Oxfordshire Accreditations constitutes accreditation by the Legal Education Board (LEB), recognition by the Philippine Government, authorization to confer the Juris Doctor degree, eligibility to take the Philippine Bar Examinations, or authority to practice law, unless such status has been separately and expressly granted by the competent Philippine authority.

PLIA shall clearly distinguish professional, continuing, certificate, diploma, or non-degree legal education from a government-regulated law degree programme.

ARTICLE III — ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIP AND SEPARATION OF FUNCTIONS

Section 8. Organizational Relationship

PLIA and EOA are affiliated entities/divisions within the same wider organizational group and perform distinct institutional functions.

PLIA is responsible for the development, administration, delivery, marketing, and student support of its educational programmes.

EOA is responsible for academic and quality-assurance review, accreditation assessment, evaluation, and related quality oversight within the scope of its accreditation framework.

The affiliation between PLIA and EOA shall be disclosed in a clear and reasonably accessible manner in relevant accreditation and institutional materials.

Section 9. No Self-Accreditation Representation

The parties shall not market PLIA as being accredited by an unrelated or wholly independent third-party organization when the accrediting entity is, in fact, affiliated with the same wider organizational group.

The preferred institutional description shall be substantially as follows:

“PLIA is accredited by Einstein Oxfordshire Accreditations, an affiliated accreditation and quality-assurance division within the wider organizational group, operating under separate academic review procedures, designated reviewers, and conflict-of-interest safeguards.”

The exact wording may be amended for brevity provided that the nature of the affiliation is not materially obscured.

ARTICLE IV — ACCREDITATION IMPARTIALITY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Section 10. Duty to Disclose

Every officer, reviewer, assessor, committee member, consultant, or other person participating in an accreditation decision shall disclose any actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest.

Section 11. Circumstances Constituting Conflict

A conflict of interest may arise where a person:

(a) participated materially in the design or delivery of the programme being assessed;

(b) has a direct financial, managerial, ownership, or employment interest in the programme or applicant;

(c) has a close personal, familial, or professional relationship with a person whose interests may be materially affected by the decision;

(d) has a personal interest in obtaining a particular accreditation result; or

(e) has another circumstance that may reasonably call the person's impartiality into question.

Section 12. Recusal

Where a material conflict exists, the affected individual shall abstain from the relevant assessment or final accreditation decision and shall not improperly influence the person or body designated to make the decision.

A substitute reviewer or decision-maker may be designated where reasonably necessary to preserve the integrity of the process.

Section 13. Independence of Decision-Making

EOA shall maintain, to the extent reasonably practicable, a distinct accreditation workflow separate from PLIA's ordinary programme-management and commercial operations.

The individual or body making the final accreditation determination shall have authority to approve, conditionally approve, defer, require corrective action, suspend, or decline accreditation based upon the applicable standards and documented findings.

ARTICLE V — ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURE

Section 14. Published or Documented Criteria

Accreditation shall be based upon documented criteria appropriate to the scope of the programme or institutional review. Such criteria may include, without limitation:

(a) programme objectives and learning outcomes;

(b) curriculum structure and content;

(c) qualifications and suitability of faculty or resource persons;

(d) learning materials and delivery mechanisms;

(e) student assessment and evaluation procedures;

(f) student support and administrative systems;

(g) programme records and quality-control procedures; and

(h) mechanisms for continuous improvement.

Section 15. Assessment Outcomes

An accreditation review may result in any of the following, as applicable under the EOA framework:

(a) approval;

(b) conditional approval subject to stated corrective measures;

(c) deferral pending additional evidence;

(d) corrective-action requirement;

(e) suspension or withdrawal for material non-compliance; or

(f) denial of accreditation.

No accreditation outcome shall be represented as guaranteed merely because PLIA and EOA are affiliated entities.

ARTICLE VI — PUBLIC DISCLOSURE AND MARKETING

Section 16. Accuracy of Accreditation Claims

PLIA's websites, advertisements, brochures, certificates, social-media materials, enrollment forms, and other communications shall accurately state the nature, scope, period, and limitations of accreditation.

PLIA shall not use the terms “government accredited,” “LEB accredited,” “CHED accredited,” “Juris Doctor accredited,” “Bar-approved,” “law school accredited,” or substantially similar expressions unless the specific representation is legally accurate and supported by the competent authority.

Section 17. Scope of Programme Recognition

Where accreditation applies only to particular short courses, certificate programmes, diploma programmes, delivery modes, or institutional functions, PLIA shall not present such accreditation as applying to programmes or qualifications outside the approved scope.

Section 18. Accreditation Mark and Certificate

Any EOA accreditation seal, logo, designation, or statement shall be used only in accordance with the approved conditions governing its use.

Certificates shall identify, where applicable, the issuing institution, programme or course, date of issuance, certificate number, accreditation or review reference, and any material limitation necessary to prevent misunderstanding regarding the nature of the credential.

ARTICLE VII — STUDENT PROTECTION, COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS

Section 19. Student Disclosure

Prospective students shall be given material information reasonably necessary to make an informed enrollment decision, including applicable tuition and fees, programme scope, delivery format, scholarship or discount conditions, accreditation status, and any material limitations of the qualification.

Section 20. Complaints

A student, applicant, faculty member, reviewer, or other affected person may submit a written complaint concerning an accreditation, quality-assurance, administrative, or disclosure matter.

Complaints shall be handled through a documented procedure and, where appropriate, by a person or body that was not directly responsible for the matter giving rise to the complaint.

Section 21. Appeals

Where an accreditation decision is subject to appeal under EOA's applicable procedures, the appellant shall be informed of the available process, material grounds for appeal, documentary requirements, and applicable timelines.

ARTICLE VIII — GOVERNANCE, RECORDS AND REVIEW

Section 22. Record Keeping

EOA and PLIA shall maintain appropriate records necessary to demonstrate the integrity of accreditation and quality-assurance processes, subject to applicable privacy and records-management requirements.

Section 23. Periodic Review

This Policy shall be reviewed periodically and whenever there is a material change in the organizational structure, applicable law, accreditation framework, or educational programmes covered by the Policy.

Section 24. Interpretation

Nothing in this Policy shall be interpreted as conferring upon PLIA or EOA any governmental, statutory, regulatory, professional-licensing, or degree-awarding authority not otherwise granted by applicable law or by a competent government authority.

In the event of any conflict between this Policy and a mandatory provision of Philippine law or a lawful order, rule, regulation, or issuance of a competent government authority, the applicable law or governmental requirement shall prevail.

ARTICLE IX — PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT

PLIA recognizes that credibility in education depends not only upon academic offerings, but also upon honest disclosure and accountable quality assurance.

Accordingly, PLIA openly acknowledges that Einstein Oxfordshire Accreditations is an affiliated accreditation and quality-assurance division within the wider organizational group. The accreditation function operates through designated procedures, reviewers, documentation requirements, conflict-of-interest controls, and formal assessment processes intended to preserve impartiality and accountability.

PLIA does not represent its affiliation with EOA as equivalent to accreditation or recognition by the Philippine Government, the Legal Education Board, the Commission on Higher Education, or any other statutory regulatory authority unless such recognition has been separately and lawfully obtained.

The purpose of this disclosure is to enable students, professional partners, employers, and other stakeholders to understand accurately the nature of PLIA's accreditation relationship and to make informed decisions based upon complete and truthful information.

APPROVAL AND ADOPTION

For Philippine Law Institute of Asia (PLIA)

Name: ____________________________________  

Position: __________________________________  

Signature: __________________________________  

Date: ______________________________________

For Einstein Oxfordshire Accreditations (EOA)

Name: ____________________________________  

Position: __________________________________  

Signature: __________________________________  

Date: ______________________________________

Document Control  

Policy Owner: PLIA / EOA Quality Assurance  

Version: 2.0  

Effective Date: July 18,2026 

Next Review Date: July 21,2028